Partner With Us
Partner With Us
Navigating the OBBBA: Impacts on Medicaid Funding

Navigating the OBBBA: Impacts on Medicaid Funding

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed into law on July 4, 2025, introduces transformative changes to Medicaid funding, significantly impacting Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs). As administrators of these safety-net facilities, your reliance on Medicaid to serve underserved populations makes immediate strategic planning essential. The Affordable Care Act enabled Medicaid expansion, allowing millions of low-income Americans to gain coverage, but OBBBA represents a significant change to these policies by imposing new restrictions and funding cuts. The OBBBA contains over 30 provisions related to Medicaid, including changes to eligibility, funding, and coverage. OBBBA policy reforms may also impact insurance options and federal funding for consumers who rely on the ACA marketplace, potentially reducing access to affordable coverage through the ACA marketplace. OBBBA’s changes mark a pivotal moment in the recent history of federal programs affecting Medicaid, as federal programs like Medicaid are being reshaped by this legislation. These changes have far-reaching consequences for the health system, as adjustments to Medicaid and CHIP threaten the overall structure and sustainability of healthcare delivery, especially for safety-net hospitals and underserved communities.

 

The OBBBA’s effects on state Medicaid budgets amplify financial pressures, with federal Medicaid funding cuts totaling $990 billion over the next decade and eliminating coverage for at least 10 million people. Additionally, the OBBBA is projected to reduce federal Medicaid spending by $911 billion over the next decade. According to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), an impartial analyst of federal legislation, by 2034, federal spending on Medicaid and CHIP benefits is expected to be cut by $1.02 trillion, resulting in the elimination of at least 10.5 million people from these programs. The children’s health insurance program (CHIP) will be directly affected, as OBBBA changes are expected to tighten CHIP eligibility and enrollment, particularly impacting children in low-income families and increasing the risk of coverage reductions for vulnerable populations. Ignoring the bill risks operational instability, reduced access to care, and service disruptions. This article explores the OBBBA’s impact on Medicaid eligibility, reimbursement rates, and state budgets, key implementation dates, legal requirements, and actionable solutions. Partnering with FasPsych, LLC for its fee-for-service staffing model, AI-driven cost efficiencies, and evidence-based psychiatric care is critical to navigating this evolving landscape.

How the OBBBA Impacts Medicaid Funding for FQHCs and CMHCs

State Medicaid Budget Impacts

The OBBBA shifts significant financial pressure onto states, which share Medicaid costs through the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP), covering 50–78% of expenses based on state income. Federal funding cuts will force states to address budget shortfalls, impacting FQHCs and CMHCs through:

  • Lower Reimbursement Rates: States may reduce provider payments, including FQHC prospective payment system (PPS) rates (averaging $180 per encounter) and CMHC reimbursements for mental health services. A 10% PPS cut could reduce FQHC revenue by $780 million annually (fiscal year 2025).
  • Elimination of Optional Benefits: States may cut non-mandatory services like dental care, non-emergency medical transportation, or expanded behavioral health programs, affecting FQHCs’ comprehensive care model and CMHCs’ ability to offer services like peer support.
  • Increased Administrative Costs: Stricter eligibility requirements necessitate costly system upgrades (estimated at $100–200 million per state), diverting funds from provider payments.
  • Provider Tax Reductions: The OBBBA prohibits all new provider taxes and reduces existing ones in expansion states to 3.5%, significantly impacting state Medicaid funding. Restrictions on provider taxes account for an estimated $191 billion in federal spending reductions (fiscal year 2025–2034). Limits on state directed payments further restrict state flexibility to increase provider reimbursements beyond standard Medicaid rates, compounding the impact of federal funding caps.
  • SNAP Cost-Sharing: Starting in 2028, states must fund part of SNAP benefits, potentially reducing Medicaid allocations.
  • Reduced Retroactive Eligibility: The OBBBA reduces retroactive eligibility from 3 months to 1 month for expansion enrollees, which may increase debt and delay treatment for vulnerable populations. Additionally, the OBBBA reduces retroactive eligibility for Medicaid enrollees to 1 month for expansion enrollees and to 2 months for others, affecting coverage for essential prenatal care and contributing to delays in treatment.

In Medicaid expansion states, approximately 24% of patient revenue comes from Medicaid patients in safety-net hospitals, making these changes particularly impactful for facilities serving vulnerable populations.

This represents a significant shift in Medicaid funding policy for states, requiring stakeholders to adapt quickly to maintain high-quality, person-centered care. With the OBBBA, nearly 1 in 4 hospitals are already characterized as financially distressed, operating with very low margins, further complicating the ability of healthcare providers to adapt to these changes. Many hospitals rely on Medicaid DSH payments to offset the underpayment for care provided to vulnerable populations. Disproportionate share hospitals, which serve a large share of Medicaid and low-income patients, are especially at risk due to DSH payment reductions under the OBBBA, increasing their financial vulnerability and threatening their ability to provide uncompensated care.

Poorer states like Mississippi face greater challenges due to high FMAP reliance and limited tax bases, amplifying risks for FQHCs and CMHCs in these regions. Around 80% of the U.S. population resides in urban areas, making hospital closures in these regions concerning.

Medicaid Eligibility vs. Reimbursement Rates

  • Eligibility: The OBBBA’s work requirements apply to adults ages 19–64, requiring 80 hours monthly of qualifying activities such as work, education, or community service, along with six-month renewals and enhanced documentation, which will reduce Medicaid enrollment. Only certain populations can receive Medicaid, depending on eligibility and compliance with work or community engagement requirements. The OBBBA further restricts Medicaid eligibility for certain immigrant groups, including lawful permanent residents and Cuban and Haitian entrants, limiting their access to essential health care services. The OBBBA mandates a five-year waiting period for many lawfully present immigrants to enroll in Medicaid/CHIP. Exemptions from work requirements include caregivers of dependent children aged 13 or younger and pregnant women. For FQHCs and CMHCs, this means fewer covered patients, increasing uncompensated care costs. FQHCs, serving diverse populations like migrant workers, and CMHCs, addressing mental health needs, serve a significant number of Medicaid patients, so reductions in Medicaid coverage will directly affect their ability to provide care to these patients. They will face higher demand for sliding-scale services. These changes present significant challenges for individuals, particularly those who are low-income adults or rural residents, in trying to maintain coverage under the new rules. Work and community engagement requirements for non-exempt adults are estimated to reduce federal spending by $326 billion over a decade.
  • Reimbursement Rates: Reduced federal funding may lead states to lower PPS rates for FQHCs and mental health reimbursements for CMHCs. This threatens financial stability, especially in states with low Medicaid rates (e.g., Florida, at 70–80% of Medicare rates).

Impact on Managed Care Organizations

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) introduces significant changes to the Medicaid program that will directly affect Managed Care Organizations (MCOs), especially those operating in Medicaid expansion states. With federal Medicaid funding facing substantial reductions, MCOs will encounter new financial and operational pressures that could reshape the landscape of Medicaid coverage and service delivery.

As the OBBBA reduces federal Medicaid funding by over $900 billion in the next decade, MCOs will see a direct impact on their revenue streams. Lower federal contributions mean that state Medicaid programs will have fewer resources to contract with MCOs, leading to tighter budgets and potential cuts in reimbursement rates. This financial squeeze may force MCOs to renegotiate contracts with healthcare providers, reduce provider networks, or limit the scope of covered Medicaid services—actions that could restrict access to care for Medicaid beneficiaries, particularly those in rural or underserved areas.

The OBBBA’s new community engagement requirements and stricter Medicaid eligibility rules will also increase administrative complexity for MCOs. These organizations will need to invest in upgraded technology systems and staff training to track compliance with eligibility rules and community engagement mandates. The added administrative burden is likely to drive up operational costs, even as overall Medicaid funding declines.

Further compounding these challenges are the OBBBA’s restrictions on state directed payments and provider taxes. By capping state directed payments and reducing allowable provider tax rates, the law limits the financial tools states and MCOs have traditionally used to support provider networks and maintain service quality. This is particularly concerning in Medicaid expansion states, where MCOs have played a critical role in managing care for low-income adults and other vulnerable populations. The Congressional Budget Office projects that these changes will not only reduce Medicaid spending but also increase uncompensated care, as more individuals lose Medicaid eligibility and turn to safety net providers for care.

To navigate these significant changes, MCOs will need to reassess their business models and explore new revenue streams, such as value-based care arrangements that reward quality and efficiency. Operational efficiencies—such as leveraging data analytics, streamlining administrative processes, and adopting innovative care management strategies—will be essential to offset rising costs and maintain provider networks. Collaboration with state Medicaid programs and healthcare providers will also be critical to ensure that Medicaid beneficiaries continue to have access to essential health services, despite the reduction in federal funding.

Key Provisions and Community Engagement

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) brings sweeping changes to the Medicaid program, introducing new requirements and restrictions that will reshape federal Medicaid funding, Medicaid coverage, and Medicaid eligibility for millions of Americans. Among the most significant changes are the community engagement requirements, which mandate that able-bodied adults must complete at least 80 hours per month of work or approved activities to maintain their Medicaid coverage. This policy, a cornerstone of the OBBBA, is projected by the Congressional Budget Office to reduce federal Medicaid spending by $344 billion over the next decade, but it also means that many Medicaid enrollees—particularly those with low incomes or in rural areas—may lose coverage due to increased administrative hurdles and compliance obligations.

Another key provision of the OBBBA is the tightening of provider taxes, a critical tool states use to secure federal matching funds for Medicaid. The law gradually lowers the allowable provider tax rate from about 6% to 3.5% by 2032, beginning a phased reduction in 2028. This change will significantly limit state funding mechanisms, reducing the dollars available to support hospitals and other healthcare providers, and increasing financial stress—especially for safety net hospitals and rural health systems that already operate with fewer resources. Rural healthcare providers continue to face ongoing financial challenges as a result of OBBBA’s Medicaid funding cuts, with limited relief from government initiatives like the Rural Healthcare Transformation Program. At the same time, the OBBBA restricts state directed payments, capping them at 100% of Medicare rates in Medicaid expansion states and 110% in non-expansion states, with any payments above these caps being phased down incrementally. These limits will further constrain states’ ability to supplement Medicaid funding and support provider networks.

The OBBBA also introduces new eligibility and enrollment requirements, including semi-annual eligibility redeterminations for Medicaid expansion adults starting at the end of 2026. These frequent renewals will likely increase coverage churn, causing many low-income individuals to cycle in and out of Medicaid coverage, and making it harder for vulnerable populations to maintain consistent access to Medicaid services. The added administrative complexity will also place new burdens on both Medicaid beneficiaries and healthcare providers, increasing the risk that eligible individuals will lose coverage due to paperwork or procedural issues.

For Medicaid expansion states, these changes are particularly significant. The reduction in federal Medicaid funding and the tightening of eligibility rules will limit the ability of states to offer optional benefits such as long-term services and supports, behavioral health, dental care, and postpartum maternal health coverage. This will widen existing coverage gaps and exacerbate health disparities, especially for those who rely on Medicaid as their primary source of health coverage. Urban safety-net hospitals are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of Medicaid cuts, as they often serve a high proportion of Medicaid patients and operate with limited financial reserves.

Healthcare providers, especially those serving rural and underserved communities, will face increased operational challenges as a result of the OBBBA’s Medicaid provisions. With fewer Medicaid funds available and stricter limits on provider taxes and state directed payments, hospitals and clinics will have to make difficult decisions about which services to offer and how to allocate limited resources. The expected rise in uncompensated care, as more individuals lose Medicaid eligibility, will further strain the financial stability of safety net hospitals and community health centers.

Overall, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the OBBBA’s Medicaid provisions will reduce federal spending by $840 billion over ten years. However, this reduction in federal spending comes at the cost of increased uncompensated care, greater financial stress for healthcare providers, and decreased access to essential Medicaid services for millions of Americans. The OBBBA will lead to increased rates of uninsured individuals in the U.S., further straining the healthcare system and exacerbating disparities in access to care. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the OBBBA’s changes to Medicaid will decrease federal outlays by $840 billion cumulatively over the next ten years.

As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve under the OBBBA, it is crucial for policymakers, providers, and community partners to prioritize the needs of vulnerable populations. Ensuring continued access to Medicaid coverage and essential health services must remain at the forefront, even as states navigate new funding constraints and operational challenges brought on by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Key Implementation Dates for the OBBBA

The OBBBA’s phased implementation requires immediate preparation for FQHCs, CMHCs, and state Medicaid programs. Key dates include:

  • July 4, 2025:
  • The OBBBA is enacted, prohibiting Medicaid reimbursement for non-abortion care at Planned Parenthood (temporarily blocked by a court injunction as of July 7, 2025), potentially increasing patient demand at FQHCs.
  • States and state Medicaid programs begin upgrading eligibility verification systems, diverting funds from provider payments.
  • 2026:
  • Work requirements take effect, reducing Medicaid enrollment and impacting FQHC and CMHC patient volumes. Similar Medicaid work requirements were previously promoted through state waivers during the Trump administration, marking a shift from prior federal policy.
  • The Rural Health Transformation Program starts, distributing $10 billion annually for rural FQHCs and CMHCs (through 2030), but urban facilities receive no direct relief.
  • A 2.5% Medicare Physician Fee Schedule increase offers minor relief for FQHCs billing Medicare.
  • Medicaid managed care organizations and managed care organizations, along with state Medicaid programs, will need to adapt to new funding and operational requirements, building partnerships and supporting workforce initiatives to maintain care access and quality.
  • 2028:
  • States fund part of SNAP benefits, straining budgets and potentially reducing Medicaid funding for FQHCs and CMHCs, directly impacting state Medicaid programs.
  • Provider tax cuts limit state revenue, affecting PPS rates and mental health reimbursements, with direct impacts on nursing homes and their ability to provide long term services.
  • New cost-sharing policies for certain expansion adults with incomes above 100% of the federal poverty level take effect, further straining low-income populations. Out-of-pocket costs for Medicaid under OBBBA are capped at 5% of family income for these individuals starting October 1, 2028.
  • Medicaid managed care organizations and managed care organizations, together with state Medicaid programs, will need to adjust to these funding and operational changes, managing risk and collaborating with states to ensure service continuity.
  • 2030:
  • Federal matching funds for improper payments (exceeding 3%) are reduced, increasing billing scrutiny for FQHCs and CMHCs.
  • 2034:
  • The moratorium on streamlined Medicaid enrollment and long-term care staffing standards expires, offering no immediate relief. This will significantly impact long term services and nursing homes, as staffing and funding challenges may intensify. Medicaid MCOs and state Medicaid programs will play a key role in managing care and supporting service continuity during these transitions. The OBBBA pauses efforts to simplify Medicaid enrollment and verification until at least October 1, 2034.

Legal Requirements and Protections for Medicaid

Medicaid’s federal and state regulations provide protections that the OBBBA cannot fully override, as these changes are grounded in public law—specifically, federal legislation such as Public Law 119-21—which shapes both federal and state healthcare policy:

  • Mandatory Benefits: Medicaid must cover outpatient hospital services, physician services, and mental health care, ensuring FQHCs’ core services and CMHCs’ mental health programs remain funded, though optional services like dental care may be cut.
  • Non-Discrimination: Federal civil rights laws ensure equitable access, critical for FQHCs and CMHCs serving diverse populations. However, immigration status can affect Medicaid eligibility and limit access to emergency services, leading to disparities in care and financial strain on hospitals due to uncompensated emergency services.
  • Due Process: Enrollees receive notice and appeal rights for coverage denials, though administrative burdens may strain facility resources. These legal protections are especially important for Medicaid beneficiaries who may face coverage denials or service reductions.

Legal challenges, such as the Planned Parenthood injunction, highlight potential vulnerabilities that could affect FQHC care coordination. Administrators should monitor developments via resources like KFF.

Potential Changes Before Implementation

Before the OBBBA’s major provisions take effect, factors could alter Medicaid funding and state budgets:

  • State Budget Adjustments: States may cut optional benefits or lower PPS rates to prepare for federal cuts, impacting FQHCs and CMHCs.
  • Congressional Action: The 2026 midterm elections could shift policy, with potential efforts to restore Medicaid funding. The bill’s $3.3 trillion deficit increase may trigger Medicare cuts, affecting FQHCs.
  • Legal Challenges: Lawsuits could delay provisions, such as funding bans, impacting state budgets and FQHC partnerships.
  • Administrative Costs: State investments in eligibility systems (estimated at $100–200 million per state) may reduce provider payments.
  • Mass Disenrollment Risks: Research indicates that bureaucratic requirements in the OBBBA will likely lead to mass disenrollment of eligible individuals from Medicaid, further straining healthcare systems. Many eligible people may lose coverage due to administrative burdens and new requirements, even if they still meet eligibility criteria. Expanded Medicaid populations are particularly at risk for coverage loss due to these changes, as work requirements and administrative hurdles disproportionately affect low-income adults covered under Medicaid expansion. Individuals who fail to meet work requirements will not only lose Medicaid but will also be barred from receiving ACA subsidies. Additionally, uncompensated care costs are expected to increase as millions of newly uninsured individuals lose Medicaid eligibility under the OBBBA. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the OBBBA’s changes will increase the number of uninsured Americans by up to 11 million.

Some key provisions of the OBBBA are designed to improve outcomes and promote preventive care by encouraging states and providers to adopt innovative approaches and upstream interventions. However, the actual impact of these provisions may be mixed, depending on how states implement them and adapt to recent history of Medicaid policy changes.

Legislative Instability and the Need for Immediate Action

Why Immediate Planning Is Essential for FQHCs and CMHCs

The OBBBA demands proactive decisions to ensure stability:

  • Revenue Diversification: Expand services for privately insured patients or optimize Medicare billing to offset Medicaid losses.
  • Cost Management: Use technologies like AI to reduce administrative costs amid state budget constraints.
  • Staffing Flexibility: Partner with adaptable staffing providers to align workforce with fluctuating patient volumes.
  • Advocacy: Engage state policymakers to protect PPS rates and mental health funding, and emphasize the need for targeted financial support to help FQHCs and CMHCs weather the impact of Medicaid funding reductions. Children and nonelderly adults in rural areas, who are more likely to depend on Medicaid compared to those in urban settings, and individuals with low incomes are especially vulnerable to service reductions and hospital closures.

FasPsych, LLC can be integral to your action plan, offering tailored staffing solutions for Medicaid funding challenges.

Reviewing Existing Staffing Relationships in Light of the OBBBA

With the OBBBA’s funding reductions and state budget pressures intensifying, now is the pivotal time for FQHCs and CMHCs to review existing staffing relationships. Goal misalignments between facilities and telepsychiatry staffing firms—where facilities prioritize patient access, quality, and compliance, while some firms focus on revenue and scalability—can lead to higher costs, outdated methods, and reduced patient satisfaction. As detailed in FasPsych’s blog, Harmony Lost: Goal Misalignments in Telepsychiatry Staffing, these misalignments often result in consequences like emergency room bottlenecks, increased reliance on expensive locum tenens, and limited scalability. Additionally, rural hospitals are at immediate risk of closure due to projected Medicaid funding cuts totaling $1.02 trillion under the OBBBA, further exacerbating access challenges for underserved populations. These Medicaid funding reductions are causing increased financial stress for rural hospitals, leading to higher uncompensated care, potential closures, and the need for strategic planning to mitigate economic strain. Over 300 rural hospitals are currently at immediate risk of closure as a result of the OBBBA’s projected Medicaid cuts. While the OBBBA includes a $50 billion relief fund for rural hospitals over five years aimed at stabilizing these facilities, this amount may not be sufficient to offset the financial losses incurred from Medicaid funding reductions. The increase in uninsured patients will raise uncompensated care costs for hospitals and clinics, placing rural hospitals at risk of closing.

Even if current partnerships seem functional, regular reviews are essential to leverage emerging technologies and efficiencies, such as AI-driven scheduling or integrated telehealth platforms. The OBBBA’s eligibility changes and reimbursement cuts amplify the need for aligned partners that support cost reduction and operational excellence. Collaboration among healthcare stakeholders—including payers, providers, states, and consumers—is crucial to ensure operational excellence and adapt to ongoing Medicaid changes. Switching to a provider like FasPsych, with its fee-for-service model, offers flexible payment structures, 24/7 on-demand access to licensed psychiatrists, and a proven $4 ROI per $1 invested in telepsychiatry, ensuring better alignment with your facility’s needs amid Medicaid instability. Evaluating relationships now can prevent dysfunctional partnerships from exacerbating financial strains and position your facility for long-term success.

Leveraging AI for Cost Efficiency Amid Medicaid Changes

Why FasPsych’s Fee-for-Service Model Is the Best Way to Prepare

FasPsych’s fee-for-service staffing model is uniquely suited to prepare FQHCs and CMHCs for the OBBBA’s Medicaid funding challenges. Unlike traditional staffing models that rely on fixed contracts or salaried positions, FasPsych’s fee-for-service approach ties costs directly to patient encounters, offering unparalleled flexibility and cost control. This model is ideal for navigating the OBBBA’s uncertainties because:

As highlighted in Solving the Mental Health Staffing Crisis, FasPsych’s fee-for-service telepsychiatry services provide 24/7 access to board-certified psychiatrists, enabling rapid response to patient needs without the overhead of permanent hires. This approach is particularly valuable for Community Mental Health Centers (CMHC) managing high-demand mental health services and FQHCs addressing primary care shortages in underserved areas.

Why Choose FasPsych for Medicaid Funding Challenges?

Schedule a Free Consultation with FasPsych Today

The OBBBA’s Medicaid reforms and state budget impacts demand immediate action from FQHCs and CMHCs. Delaying risks harm to your ability to serve vulnerable populations. Partnering with FasPsych, LLC provides the fee-for-service staffing, cost-saving technologies, and evidence-based care needed to thrive. Schedule a free consultation today or call 877-218-4070 to develop a tailored action plan and secure your facility’s future.

FasPsych TelePsych Partner
Facebook X-twitter Linkedin
TelePsychiatric Services
Explore FasPsych